This book is a collection of exploration, discovery, and curiosity as seen through the eyes of an observer. Here is an attempt to present numerable and credible findings of daring and brave scientists, researchers, medical doctors, mathematicians, philosophers, historians, artists and searching souls, who boldly speak the truth of their discoveries, in a way that the reader may begin to see the cohesive threads that connect them all and openly ask the questions that come to mind. Current runs through everything, from the macro to the micro. This current is electromagnetism. It is present in every facet of our shared Universe and History. While I am eternally grateful to those whose time and findings are shared within this text, the views, opinions, questions, and ideas, unless otherwise expressed, are completely my own. My hope is that through open dialogue and informed research, we may build new structures of perception that will allow us to bridge the gaps between the fields of understanding.
Heather Stargazer Love and Light
Heather Stargazer is an author, artist, and Galaxy Class Stargazer who hales from somewhere near the 42nd parallel. As a classically trained artist and craftsman, Heather has spent the past twenty years exploring the inner-workings of the electric cosmos and symbolism, and humanity’s relationship with them. Her work is the product of the inspirational spaces within which we all reside. Working with several dedicated members and organizations of the Electric Universe community, she has invited us to explore these new realms of electromagnetic possibilities and connect to a whole new understanding of what has come before us and where we are going in the future. There are currents that flow between all facets of Science, History, Nature, and Humanity. These currents are the key to unlocking the next level of our collective understanding. She asks that you please join us on this journey as we wake up in real time to the Electric Universe.
Born and raised in Detroit, Michigan, Heather attended The College for Creative Studies with a major in Fine Arts and a Minor in Interdisciplinary Crafts. In 2006, She traveled the American West for six years studying diverse aspects of American culture. For her, a recreational focus on writing poetry and a curiosity about physics has opened many doors to friendships and newfound understandings of Universal Mechanics. Stargazer found a home with many writer’s groups in Michigan, Colorado, and California. Among them are Poetry West in Colorado Springs, Poetry719, and a nomination for spoken word poet of the year by the Pikes Peak Council of The Arts in 2009. In 2012, Stargazer founded Wordsmith’s Writers Workshop in Wyandotte Michigan. Most recently, Stargazer has attended several Science Conferences to collect data for her first book, including The Thunderbolts Project EU2017 Future Sciences Conference to research Electric Cosmology and the electromagnetic interconnection between all things. She has more conferences lined up for the future. Stargazer hopes to have her second book finished next year (2021)
Welcome to a different perspective on the Ancient Irish megaliths. What can we learn about our past and our future by looking at history in a totally different way? Join the Heathen StarGazers as we explore light, logic, stones, and sound spiraling out a whole new twist on the Ancient past. * A special thank you to all the people whose work has made this possible. Your light is so bright! And, an apology to anyone whose mention I may have forgotten. Many steps make the journey. May our paths ever cross with gratitude. H.S.
A place for inspiration to learn and stars to shine.
Brought to you by our host, Heather Stargazer. Heather is an artist and writer who is drawing lines between the art of science and new views on history. What has already been discovered? What will we discover next?
Heathen Stargazers is a socially interactive group directed at educating through inspiration. Incorporating information from many dependable sources and varying perspectives of people within their respective fields with the general public and citizen explorers enables the former to clarify their own findings and bring forth new data and discoveries, and the latter to ask questions and also voice their own perspectives so that the two may create a more harmonious level of learning and interactions in society as a whole. Through social media, publication on YouTube, A website, and face-to-face meetings, we achieve broader networks, spread more information, discover amazing things, and inspire a whole new world of ideas.
I’m a peacock. Well. I mean, I was a peacock. Not that
anyone at my Alma Mater had much school spirit. Though, one year we did have an
end of the year luau with a pig on a spit. Apple in its mouth and everything.
Put a chubby, male, transportation design senior exchange student in a
corn-silk wig and a poofy-white-satin-thrift-store wedding gown. Sat him
awkwardly in a stolen shopping cart and paraded him around as our homecoming
queen. Glittery Mardi Gras tiara and confetti. I thought it was one of the best
school events we’d had but, all the vegan kids complained about the bacon
smell. So, Dylan Spatzky taped two pieces of raw bacon to the vending machine
with a sign that said, “50 cents” and called it ephemeral art. I didn’t buy the
bacon but I liked the idea. We’re all peacocks in our own way.
Our expression is a manifestation of our vision. An outward
projection of an inner assessment. The assessment is characterized by how we
view or see a What? Whatever it is we see.
At art school we are taught to take apart the assessment to the bare
bones and identify the things that are calling to us. Then present an effective
translation of the particular bones that called. It this case, it might be ham
We draw what we see. Sometimes we see it in front of us.
Sometimes we see it in our imagination. We write what we experience, observe,
learn, and dream. As artists, if we can find a uniquely creative way to
communicate our expression, we may consider ourselves successful. There are
those who embrace the abstract and there are others who come by an innate
photorealism. As if they had eyes in their hands.
After five years at the same school, twenty-five years in
the same city, it all started to look the same. Different interpretations of
the same things. Broken windows of abandoned factories in charcoal, home bums
in baggy clothes foreshortened to weird angles, everyone’s roommates in their
identical dorm bathrooms making faces in the mirror. And cars. Shit tons of
This is the landscape that surrounds; the available subject
matter. When we see something abnormal show up in an individual’s work, we see
said abnormality as the artist’s metaphor. When we see something carried
through multiple works relative to a specific time and place, we can presume
that “something” was a tangible presence so impactful, many individuals felt
the impressing need to document it. These impactful presences can be so
abundantly used they become symbols.
There are innumerable symbols in use worldwide including the
letters of our written languages. When a symbol is applied to multiple
meanings, its origins become lost in translation. We see them. We use them. We
don’t know why. There are symbols we can’t equate. Icons so far removed from
their origin we dismiss their authenticity. We see them now as graphics or
logos. Technically, “logos” means the word of God but it also means, reason. What were the reasons for these symbols again?
We’ve passed them through a game of telephone so long that what is now heard
resembles nothing of what was said.
The thing that’s striking is that the exact same symbols can
be found throughout the ancient world accompanied by similar stories all
assigning the similar attributes to similar symbols in similar ways.
What’s even more staggering is that the evolution of these
symbols and themes coincides globally with verifiable geological occurrences.
As humans, we influence each other. But how much? Does it
matter what others think? Did we make that for someone else or for ourselves?
Did we make it because everyone else made one? Why are we making those anyway?
Why does yours look different from mine? How can we all be looking at the same things
and seeing them so differently? And how can the exquisite diversity of some
things be seen in such finite ways? How can we understand it unless we view it
from multiple angles? What if we can’t even see it from here?
The deeper we peer into our microscopes the more things
start to look the same. It seems these patterns repeat out into the infinity of
space. Solar systems begin to resemble atoms. Galaxies begin to resemble
hurricanes. The Universe suddenly looks like the web of neurons that transmit
the electrical impulses in our brains.
Is it really all the same? Or does it just look that way? If
you drew them could you tell them apart? If it looks the same, why shouldn’t we
expect it to behave similarly as well? Have we been looking over some of the
most basic universal patterns because our science education has taught us to
adopt their misunderstanding of universal mechanics? Is it hidden in plain
I think I see it right there. Just behind the individuality.
We find comfort in patterns. They organize things so we know
what to expect. When we know what to expect, we don’t have to worry about
what’s going to happen in the future. We can focus on other things. Nature is
elegant at presenting infinite possibilities within a set pattern while still
adhering to the pattern’s basic principles. I find those expressions to be akin
to music. The swing in the beat between beats. The soul of the music. It’s the
thing that drives your feet to tapping and your hands to clapping. It’s the
thing that gets us to a state of consciousness that connects us to the players
and other listeners. The swing is what uplifts us in melody and what unites us
in harmony. I mean, it don’t mean a thing if it ain’t got that swing, right?
Is that swing between the pattern of the equation where the
spirit of life exists? Is that the missing link that resides outside the math
and scientific method of it all?
Music is very grounding to me. My tastes vary as much as my
experience thus, music is a catalyst for immediate emotional support. What song
was I listening to when I last felt that way? What playlist brings me joy?
Whose lyrics are going to help me feel validated, understood, less alone? How
many instruments’ strings can stroke my soul? How much metal does it take to
sooth my angst? Punk rock is university in spikes. Appalachian mountain music
feels like bare feet in cool grass in a place my grandpa talked about.
To know these rhythms is to know your place. Each dance is
different. Each voice its own song. But it’s all a part of the music.
What if stars were just having their own experience?
They say this is the lifestyle for most stars. We can see
them in their vast expanses of space twinkling bright and then fizzling out
like many a one hit wonder. In this view, each star and our own Sun are
independent entities that live out their own dreams on their own terms. Free to
join forces and become binaries or explode into supernovas who spread their
remnants around in a fit to be gathered into new objects later. They say all
stuff is created from the star-stuff thrown about in these tantrums. One star’s
trash is now someone’s mother. Or, maybe they just collapse under the pressure
and become villainous blackholes who want to suck everything into their
collapse with them. Misery does love company after all. If they can’t emit
light then no one will!
It all seems as disconnected and melodramatic as the stuffy,
closed set of an outdated soap opera. Like the sands of the hourglass nebula,
these are the ways of our skies.
Maybe it’s Us who are feeling disconnected in our
Are we projecting our feelings of loneliness onto our view
of the universe? Let’s reject the notion that we are connected to it lest we
not be rejected by it first.
I say this to illustrate a point. It’s easier to understand
something when given an emotional basis for comparison. Science is cold. Hard.
Facts. It has to be to do its job. When we remove any of the components of the whole,
we fail to see the entirety of its function. We are a part of a greater whole
that exists within a set of scientific barriers that are only extended when fed
more cold, hard, facts. And yet we simultaneously exist outside of those perimeters.
It seems the biggest misconception is that there is one
Right answer out there that is going to line all the ducks up in a row to spell
the alphabet backwards. Proving all else, without exception, to be wrong.
Maybe it’s the vernacular to blame.
If something is right something else must inherently be
wrong. Then what’s left?
Yeah, everything in nature has its equal and opposite but in
that, one cannot exist without the other. Without that oppositional balance,
both things would neutralize and the variance and extremities would cease to
exist. We hold tight to our rights because no one wants to end up being in the
wrong. Or worse, ceasing to exist all together. I promise everyone can be right
and wrong all at the same time and we will all still exist.
Whew! Glad we got that out of the way.
What about exchanging the word “right” for the word “truth”?
Something can be true without carrying the burden of being right or wrong.
Things can be simultaneously true and untrue depending on context and
circumstance. Scientific truth is truth based on facts. Asking what is true within a question allows
for exploration without creating a competition to elevate or degrade
Our predecessors had no problem seeing the effects of some
of these truths. They embraced them and nurtured the growth of their cultures
through what we suppose is magic. Are these forces of ritual, these symbols
carved and repeated, the misguided notions of the uneducated ignorant? Or are
they the culmination of eons of understanding expressed globally that we as
modern humans have dismissed?
Some of us can’t accept something unless we can see it, poke
it, prod it, test it, and then recreate it in a lab. Others of us can see
something is a thing that has a function by the observation of its service and
simply accept that it does exist.
The camps are set. Their sandy floor is separated by the
draw of a child’s stick digging a shallow line that falls back in on itself as
it leads to an arbitrary end. Thus, the endless bickering and banter. How does
banter evolve into conversation? How do we know what to believe?
I’ve heard that the way to the truth is through the light.
Maybe the truth is that light that shines the way. Maybe it’s actually about
light. Maybe that’s what they saw that we’re not seeing.
But who put any of us
in charge anyway? Must have been that damn peacock. Ya know, He has many eyes but can only see
with two. And even then, they have to be open.
and Evolution- Did the Color of Light Contribute to Evolution?
A Question by: Heather Stargazer, 2019
I wonder if there are beings out there in the Universe who visually see things
in wavelength bands outside our visible spectrum of light and wonder if they
can even see us. Realistically, we can only see in other wavelengths when
they’ve been converted to colors we can see. We can’t actually see infrared but
we can create a model of it. We couldn’t see radio waves until we discovered
them and translated them and now we use them. Their discovery revolutionized
communication. We can’t see the microwaves emanating from the kitchen but, are
there beings out there who would see them as if a lamp had come on? Plants eat light.
They take the lumen packets of spectral light and convert them into metabolic
have heat signatures, so things that see in infrared can see us. We have a
slight bioluminescence. We have electric impulse. What other wavelengths do we
project? How do those outside wavelengths interact with our wavelengths? How
can we see it when it’s happening?
do energy, frequency, and vibration have in common? They like to ride the
waves, Braw. Hang ten. They all travel in waves at different rates and speeds
through space and matter. They radiate. They’re radiation.
the light we see is a kind of radiation. The types of radiation are categorized
by their wavelength range and the temperature at which they are radiated by an
object. The visible spectrum has a wavelength range of 390-700 nanometers which
is roughly a frequency of 430-700 THz (terahertz). The wavelengths span from 0-0.01 for gamma
rays, to more than 10,000,000 which are our beloved radio waves. Even within
our visible spectrum color variations are separated by the different
wavelengths at which they travel. Still with me?
weird that this has been the most difficult video to make so far. There’s so
much to say here.
want to talk to you guys about the resonance of light and sound. I found a ton
of stuff on the effects of varying resonances on the human body. Tones and
pitches of waves projected in special shapes that kill tumors or halt the
progression of Alzheimer’s. Frequencies to make people relax, frequencies to
help people sleep. Waves and tones for just about everything. If frequencies
can have such a huge impact on our metabolisms and psychological function, what
happens when the incoming frequencies of the space weather change? How could
the colors of incoming light have changed us? How could changing frequencies
have changed the world? Is there anything you would like to tell us about this?
Is there anything helpful you could add? Please let us know in the comments
I was wondering what the plants had to say
about it. Plants enjoy different flavors of light waves for different meals.
Plants are cool because they have this habit of mutating to suite the
environment changing around them. They do this at an impressive pace because
they have to. It’s amazing. They are sensitive and responsive. They have a
choice to dance or dwindle. They are beautiful dancers.
is a fascinating thing. The light we see is actually little, tiny particle
packets called lumens. The different colors we see are streams of lumens riding
different wavelengths. They are separated by speed and temperature which is
measured using the Kelvin scale. Plants tend to like between 6500K and 5000K to
grow in the cool and bright light of spring. Then in the fall when the light is
around 3000K, they flower and fruit in their ready for a winter’s nap. When a
stream of lumen packets runs into an object, the lumens will either be absorbed
or reflected back. We see the color that is the reflected wavelengths.
Chlorophyll, the substance in plants responsible for photosynthesis, is
generally green. That means that the plants are absorbing all the other
spectrums of lumens. Those lumens are then metabolized to not only nourish the
plant, but also as indicators for hormonal stage changes. They’re basically
eating colors of light and some wavelengths that are beyond our vision like
ultraviolet and infrared.
plants go through vegetative and flowering stages during their life cycle. The
ratio for the amount of daylight verses the amount of darkness is referred to
as a photo-period. Those in equatorial regions with a steady daily average of
daylight developed much different photocycles than those who reside closer to
the polar regions. Some of the differences are, of course, to do with climatic
temperature but, the majority of the function is determined by photo-period and
the wavelength temperature of available sunlight at a particular time of year.
The chlorophyll molecules in plants are covered in photoreceptors that are
photoreactive. The light sets off chemical reactions within the metabolism of
the plant telling it when to do what.
It’s why frost kills crops and why we are starting to see things bloom
earlier and harvest at strange times. Plants tend to be excellent indicators
for Solar System changes because it is very literally disrupting their diet.
We, in turn, are affected by their dietary change. In more ways than one might
Plants are very sensitive to disruptions in the light they are
digesting. In general, they can’t really move their location. They’ve had to
come up with other options. Immediate Evolution is an excellent option.
Sometimes, it’s the only option. The mapping of plant genomes is a gargantuan
task whose results are forever of questionable debate. While most studies build
similar chronologies and family trees for the evolution of all that’s green ,
it is extremely hard to separate the lineages at some branches because of this
Immediate Evolutionary tendency. Since these adaptations are often individual
mutations, there becomes an infinite number of directions and some never make
it past the successive generation. It is when the mass of the species is
simultaneously forced to adapt and does it synchronistically across the breadth
of the species that it becomes an entirely new form of that species. Some
groups will maintain the special qualities of the former generation by
strengthening features already in place. Other groups may change themselves
entirely, constituting a new species.
What was happening on the Earth at the times of these great
evolutionary leaps? I would bet you dollars to donuts that whatever it was, it
had more to do with the frequencies than any other factor. Light waves are a
species of the Electromagnetic spectrum. Through this description of importance
of light on the metabolic processes of just a few of the 391,000 vascular plant
species, we may begin to see the impact the color of light can have on what is
able to live on this planet. How does that affect us?
“What Sunshine is to flowers,
smiles are to humanity. These are the trifles, to be sure, but scattered along
life’s pathway, the good they do is inconceivable.” Joseph Addison
“It’s been proven by quite a
few studies that plants are good for our psychological development. If you
green an area, the rate of crime goes down. Torture victims begin to recover
when they spend time outside in a garden with flowers. So, we need them, in
some deep psychological sense, which I don’t suppose anyone really understands
yet.”. Jane Goodall
“Let a hundred flowers bloom,
let a hundred schools of thought contend.”
amazing too that most of these waves come from the sky.
“The sky and its stars
make music in you.”- Temple of Hathor, Dendera
This statement has profound implications. The vibratory
constitution of the biologic make-up is what drives the development of the form
and its functional role within its context.
“…One third of the sensory-motor cortex of the brain is devoted
to the tongue, oral cavity, lips, and speech. In other words, oral frequency
emissions spoken or sung, exert powerful control over life, vibrating genes
that influence total well-being and even influence evolution of the species.”
Dr. Leonard Horowitz. Seems important.
Ani Williams of Songaia Sounds describes each person’s voice as
a unique blueprint, a story of their genetic pattern. She says this theory is
based on thousands of years of practice by cultures all over the world. In the
17th and 18th centuries, the idea of music as a mirror of
creation was a common study called, musica speculativa. Johannes Kepler
said, “The Greek word “Kosmos” means a creation that is harmonically and
artistically arranged with elegance and beauty divinely ordered.”
1998, a friend invited me to visit her brother. While there, I had the amazing
opportunity to meet a Mayan Aztec medicine woman named Grandma Wind Rider No
Moccasins at Cottonwood Hot Springs in Colorado. She had brought with her these
clay vessels that had been found in the Andes Mountains of Peru. There were
eight vessels, each was a round, terracotta, hollow figure with a fluted tube
sticking out the top. They looked like fat bellied Buddhas with chimneys on
their heads. One vessel was the Grandmother and one was the Grandfather. Eight
people sat in a circle with Grandma and Grandpa opposite from each other. The
person holding Grandfather would start by drawing in a deep breath and exhaling
at a comfortable rate across the chimney opening on top of the vessel creating
a vibration of sound much like playing an old Hill Billy jug. The next person
would draw a breath and begin and then the next and so on until all the vessels
were being played in the round in what became a high-pitched buzzing tornado
that filled my entire body. I would have thought that such a high pitch would
have been irritating and shrill but that wasn’t the case. It was pleasant and
calming. Grandma Wind Rider had told that this was the sound of the Universe
and that the Ancients connected and spoke to spirit aliens with these
vibrations. She even said that it was the sound the alien ships would make when
they would visit. That within these sounds we would each hear our own harmonic
resonance and that we would know it by its familiarity. She said that Tibetan
monks had come to Peru to blow on these very vessels. She was taking them to
The Sun Dance in North Dakota. The experience of this encounter stays with me.
When we think about ourselves,
our parts, our bits, the animal, vegetable, and mineral that is human, in this
big electric field of Earth, and Solar system and Galaxy, how do we describe
our interactive make up? We are, essentially, iron laden sacks of salt water
with mineral conduits conducting electromagnetic impulses throughout our
systems to activate us. Wouldn’t it then stand to reason that we are conducting
interaction on an electromagnetic level with all other charges we come in
contact with? However far reaching that contact might be? How often do you think of a friend then they
call you? It’s weird how we were all thinking about pizza for dinner. Seems
like everyone is on edge today. You could feel the excitement in the stadium.
The whole crowd was on fire! You knew I
was going to say that.
A 2013 National Geographic article titled, Bees Can Sense the Electrical Fields of Flowers, it was revealed in
detail how not only were the bees electrically attracted to the flowers, the
flowers also responded to the bee’s activities.
“Dominic Clarke and Heather Whitney from the University of Bristol
have shown that bumblebees can sense the electric field that surrounds a
flower. They can even learn to distinguish between fields produced by different
floral shapes, or use them to work out whether a flower has been recently
visited by other bees. Flowers aren’t just visual spectacles and smelly beacons.
They’re also electric billboards.”
The article goes on to explain
the electric relationship between an insect and a flower.
“Scientists have, however, known about the electric side of
pollination since the 1960s, although it is rarely discussed. As bees fly
through the air, they bump into charged particles from dust to small molecules.
The friction of these microscopic collisions strips electrons from the bee’s
surface, and they typically end up with a positive charge. Flowers, on the other
hand, tend to have a negative charge, at least on clear days. The flowers
themselves are electrically earthed, but the air around them carries a voltage
of around 100 volts for every meter above the ground. The positive charge that
accumulates around the flower induces a negative charge in its petals. When the
positively charged bee arrives at the negatively charged flower, sparks don’t
fly but pollen does….. some videos showing that pollen literally jumps from the
flower to the bee, as the bee approaches… even before it has landed …..The bee
may fly over to the flower but at close quarters, the flower also flies over to
Flowers are so cool! They are
communicating to each other electrically. Can you do that?
You certainly can. The ancient Eastern
philosophies that are stapled in the body’s electromagnetic meridians are
making their way into modern Western medicine. Each living being has its very
own magnetosphere that is resonating off of them right now. There are even
medically recognized therapies and benefits to working with the human
The author of Energy Medicine, Donna Eden wrote, “Modern science is finally recognizing that
energy constitutes the blueprint of the physical body. Meanwhile, the energetic
vibration of sound can be used to change that blue print in ways that foster
health and well-being.”
If we are Humangets Electricum,
as I like to call us, whose parts are the assembly of star parts, couldn’t it
feasibly be reasoned that when our charge of life is ignited, that charge would
be indicative of the galactic and planetary magnetism of that specific time,
place, and star part make up? In the observation study of atoms, it was noticed
that if an atom was split into two parts and those two parts were separated by
great distances (miles) and one part of the atom was set spinning by a magnet,
the other half of the atom would spin as well. People argue the exact reason
for this but as it stands now, this is known as “quantum
entanglement”. Both halves spin at the same time, simultaneously,
regardless of the distance between them. That means the information
communicated between the two parts occurred faster than the speed of light.
They do this naturally. In 2017, Chinese
scientists were able to set a spin both parts of a split atom simultaneously at
a distance of 1200 km. Baffling.
harmonic resonance of the Earth is 7.83 Hz. This is the frequency of Om. When
Buddhists chant the Om they are creating a vibration in harmony with the
vibration of the planet. Some Ancients believed that the Universe was a huge
orchestra playing a symphony in concert. How could they know that?!?!
planet songs in their own key and voice. Saturn’s Cassini probe has recorded
the sounds of Saturn. He’s singing in an octave of 147.85 Hz. Kind of eerie and
haunting, just as you’d think Saturn would sound. They’re available for a
listen on numerous online sources. Check ‘em out….
ALBA MUNDI, The Sound of the
“The earth and each of the planets
of the solar system revolving around the sun makes a musical note so low it
cannot be heard by the human ear. “
If we imagine a piano keyboard
without limitation, the sound of the earth is a “C sharp” placed 33
octaves below middle C (about 4.7 meters left of the piano bench)
The song “Alba Mundi” is composed
in the key of the earth, and the harmony of the track evolves by using the nine
notes of the planets orbit frequency.
Mercury – the closest planet to
the sun – plays a “C sharp” with its orbit. The orbit of Venus runs
the note “A”, and the sequence goes on with the Earth (C sharp), Mars
(D), Jupiter (F sharp), Saturn (D), Uranus (G sharp), Neptune (G sharp) and
Pluto (C sharp). At the end of the piece, after the final crescendo you can
listen to the “sound” of the solar system, accelerated by more than
68 billion times in order to be audible to the human ear.
The recording of the piece
“Alba Mundi” was mastered by Alex Wharton (who has worked for
Coldplay, Bjork, Gorillaz) at the Abbey Road studios in London, the historic
recording studios where the Beatles and Pink Floyd albums were produced.”
“The radio emission from the
distant galaxies served as background ‘flashlights’ that shine through the
Bridge………Its magnetic field then changes the polarization of the radio signal.
How the polarized light is changed tells us about the intervening magnetic
field. A radio signal, like a light wave, oscillates or vibrates in a single
direction or plane; for example, waves on the surface of a pond move up and
down. When a radio signal passes through a magnetic field, the plane is
rotated. This phenomenon is known as Faraday Rotation and it allows astronomers
to measure the strength and the polarity—or direction—of the field.”
to PhysicistsPage@facebook, it works
at the molecular level too.
“Quantum particles have one
very unique property, namely they can be in different states at the same time.
This is referred to as “Superposition” of two conditions. Based on this
instance the ‘spin’ of an electron can be pointing in two directions at
and ‘round we go. Where we’ll stop, no one knows…..
of my favorite pastimes is watching experiments that mimic the behavior of
greater forces. Some of the best are when granules are spread out on a smooth
flat surface and exposed to different frequencies of sounds. It’s called
Cymatics. When the sound is switched on, the chaos of spilled granules dances
itself into repeating geometric patterns. It’s so cool. They make flowers and
stars, mandalas and snowflakes. They know all the moves and they swing
themselves into the shape of the rhythm.
same types of frequencies shape atoms into the rhythms of matter written in the
music of energies.
“Harmonic resonance is an
extraordinarily diverse and varied phenomenon seen in countless forms
throughout the universe, from gravitational orbital resonances, to
electromagnetic oscillations, to acoustical vibrations in solids, liquids, and
gases, to laser resonance in light and microwaves.”
If the Moon can tug on the great
mass of the oceans that make up 71% of the Earth’s surface, pulling the tides
dozens of feet inward towards the shore and back out into itself, what is it
doing to the 73% of our bodies that is water? If the magnetism of the Sun and
Planets can tug on the strings of Earth causing earthquakes, volcanic
eruptions, and super storms, how do the magnetic fields affect our own
“The effects of cosmic rays on our own genetics has led to
mutations within the body, within the mind, the brain, that has altered our
perception of reality… The correspondence between ancient cosmic ray levels and
sudden evolutionary leaps and human technology and art are facts.”
We are subject to the
electromagnetic fields around us. A study published to ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, found -”
An investigation was made of individual reactions of human subjects exposed to
electromagnetic fields…. We found that the electromagnetic perception of
women being correlated with their individual features…. Human subjects who
had a high-quality perception of electromagnetic waves showed an optimal
balance of cerebral processes, an excellent functional state of the central
nervous system and a good decision criterion.”
“… correlated with their individual features……….”
That’s saying that people who have a healthy electromagnetic balance are better
at receiving electromagnetic activity and processing it in a more balanced way.
I’d venture to say they are probably more balanced, stable people but in
reality, being a fluid electromagnetic conduit is too much for some.
Especially, when the person doesn’t realize that it is a very real physiological
experience that they have the power to direct. Balanced energy flow. Inner
peace. We all respond according to our individual fields, the healthy balance
of our internal conductivity.
There’s a group of researchers
whose focus on the effects of electromagnetic solar activity on the human body
systems. They are the HearthMath
Institute. The evidence they have collected is astoundingly conclusive. The
human body, individually and collectively, is directly related to the solar
system weather. Links below. (Published in the Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health2017, 14(7), 770 on July 15,
2017 these findings are available for further analysis. Synchronization of Human Autonomic Nervous System Rhythms with
Geomagnetic Activity in Human Subjects)
“Human regulatory systems are designed to adapt to daily and
seasonal climatic and geomagnetic variations; however, sharp changes in solar
and geomagnetic activity and geomagnetic storms can stress these regulatory
systems, resulting in alterations in melatonin/serotonin balance, blood
pressure, immune system, reproductive, cardiac, and neurological processes.
Disturbed geomagnetic activity is associated with the intensification of
existing diseases, significant increases in myocardial infarction incidence and
death, changes in blood flow, aggregation, and coagulation, increased blood
pressure, cardiac arrhythmias, and seizures in epileptics….Overall, the study
suggests that daily autonomic nervous system activity not only responds to
changes in solar and geomagnetic activity, but is synchronized with the
time-varying magnetic fields associated with geomagnetic field-line resonances
and Schumann resonances. A likely explanation for how solar and geomagnetic
fields can influence human nervous system activity is through a resonant
coupling between our nervous systems and geomagnetic frequencies (Alfvén
waves), or ultra-low frequency standing waves in the earth-ionosphere resonant
cavity (Schumann resonances) that overlap with physiological rhythms.”
In 2017, NASA researchers
announced that human technology has created a bubble around Earth effectively
barricading our planet from outside radiation. The Atlantic posted the headline, “Humans Accidentally Created a Protective Bubble Around
Earth.” Hmm…., “Protective Bubble”? I had to know more.
Futurism.com posted an article titled, “Human Activity May Have Caused a Barrier That Shields Earth from
Space Radiation.” It says…
“The study, which was published in the journal Space Science
Reviews under the title “Anthropogenic
Space Weather “, was conducted by a team of scientists from the US and Imperial College, London. Led by Dr. Tamas Gombosi, a professor at
the University of Michigan and the
director at the Center for Space
Modelling, the team reviewed the impact anthropogenic processes have on
Earth’s near-space environment.
These processes include VLF and radio-frequency (RF) radio
communications, which began in earnest during the 19th century and grew
considerably during the 20th century. Things became more intense during the
1960s when the United States and the Soviet Union began conducting
high-altitude nuclear tests, which resulted in massive electromagnetic pulses
(EMP) in Earth’s atmosphere. To top it off, the creation of large-scale power
grids has also had an impact on the near-space environment. As they state in
‘The permanent existence, and growth, of power grids and of VLF
transmitters around the globe means that it is unlikely that Earth’s
present-day space environment is entirely “natural” – that is, that the
environment today is the environment that existed at the onset of the 19th
century. This can be concluded even though there continue to exist major
uncertainties as to the nature of the physical processes that operate under the
influence of both the natural environment and the anthropogenically-produced
Let these guys break it down a
little more for you… Remember this part from earlier? Mapping
the magnetic bridge between our nearest galactic neighbors
radio emission from the distant galaxies served as background ‘flashlights’
that shine through the Bridge,” …… “Its magnetic field then changes
the polarization of the radio signal. How the polarized light is changed tells
us about the intervening magnetic field.”
A radio signal, like a light wave, oscillates or vibrates in a single
direction or plane; for example, waves on the surface of a pond move up and
down. When a radio signal passes through a magnetic field, the plane is
rotated. This phenomenon is known as Faraday Rotation and it allows astronomers
to measure the strength and the polarity—or direction—of the field.””
corrupted our pond ripple. They have no idea what the effects of it are. If the
Earth is a capacitor in the Electric Solar System, shouldn’t we be plugged in?
Did we “corrode” our conductor thus insulating contact and now all
the living beings on the planet are disconnected, cut off from outer
space? Does this “bubble”
really “protect” us? Does it hinder us Earthlings in any way(s)? Was
it the result of an ill-conceived plan of the short sighted? A faux pas? Or,
did they mean to unplug us? Whether it
was intended or not, what is the reality of the situation? What happens if we
plug back in?!?
If it is all repeated and it
turns out this is an expression of an atom, wouldn’t we then be electrons? We
need grounding and feel incomplete and or inadequate unless attached to others.
Aren’t we at our finest when we are one of many things that feel the net that
is everything and attach ourselves to it? Would the great idea of Buddhism
detachment then be the first step to neutralizing ourselves, our charge, so we
can then become a being of light or a photon? In a physical sense, since plants
are producers who convert light into energy, does that make them beings of
light? When their roots take in nutrients from soil enriched with the remnants
of our decayed forms, have we then become one step closer to the light? When we
find ways to “raise our vibration” are we trying to become positively
charged ions in an attempt to rip away our negative electron charge and flip
polarity to a positive proton as the next step in becoming a lumen packet? Do
we get to pick the color wave we surf or is the spectrum just the next
hierarchy of steps towards pure white light? Then what?
Harmonic Resonance (HR) can dance molecules into the forms it desires, can we
humans also sing and dance our environment into desired forms? If the plants
have to evolve because of dancing waves, must we too? If the waves can affect
us, can we affect the waves? Can we direct them to our desires? Is the rain
dance capable of manifesting rain? Are the ritualistic chantings and colored
garb, repeated movements like a genuflect while signing a cross over your
heart, all energetically mechanized to arrange matter and circumstances to our
liking? Do we hold that kind of power?
Is the Jutsu of my beloved ninjas real?
“”Jū” can be translated
to mean “gentle, soft, supple, flexible, pliable, or yielding.”
“Jutsu” can be translated to mean “art” or
“technique” and represents manipulating the opponent’s force against
himself rather than confronting it with one’s own force.”
Jujutsu – Wiki’s say, what?!?
can’t help but think of everything else that comes in waves. Water slapping
against the edges between it and earth. The wind blowing through tall grass.
Inspiration during a project. Our blood pumping through our veins. Lungs
breathing in and out. The seasons. Birds flying in unison overhead. Laughter
comes in waves. Are all these waves different energetic expressions mimicking
the pulses of radiant energy that drives them? How can changing our perspective
help us react to and interact with these waves and radiant energy? What impact
have they had on the human species during these times in history of changes in
exposure? Maybe, the way to see the history
is to listen the light. Maybe I heard that wrong. What does it sound like to
I want to make people wonder why they feel the way they do
about whatever it is they feel about. We are disconnected from ourselves and each
other. A lot of times we don’t even know how we feel. Or, maybe, we know how we
feel but we don’t really understand why. Not well enough to critique ourselves
on it. Not well enough to give ourselves a good answer. Not well enough to know
how to feel differently if we want to. Or well enough to know why we want to keep
feeling the way we do. Well enough to connect with ourselves. We’re expressing
all kinds of things but seem to be collectively missing the point. What is the
point? What is it we are feeling so strongly but failing to see?
The repression of ourselves has become tumultuous. The
feelings have overwhelmed. In defense of ourselves, we fortify our resolve to
hold on to the strongest feelings we have and go about expressing them in
unproductive, and sometimes dangerous ways. We fear the vulnerability of change.
Inward, outward, we direct our energy in ways that relieve what we perceive as
discomfort. We identify ourselves as these feelings. We make ourselves them. To
not accept them as true is to not accept ourselves. If we don’t like our feelings, we must not
like ourselves. It might be healthy to let go of the personal rigidities that
keep us guarded and mean. We can be so guarded and mean. It might help us be
more fluid to bend and flow with the current of change that is inevitable. Help
us grow and evolve. Help us change our perceptions of ourselves. If that’s what
Too much force breaks things. It strips threads and loses
its grip. I’m not for war or aggression, but I am getting fed up with
diplomacy. There has to be another option. To an extent. Diplomacy has done its
fair share of damage and is just as dirty as any type of politics. Diplomacy
can be a mending of bridges or it can be a kind and compassionate assault. It
can be a healing balm or it can be the sugary, candy coating over bullshit that
would do better to sparkle sweetly than decay. Where is the suitable balance
between honesty and fairness? For they are not the same. Which virtue holds a
greater precedence? Which value holds more valor? How proud of ourselves are we?
We hold these truths to be self-evident that all people are created flawed and
that the only peaceful balm to resolution comes with the pangs of an honest and
searching fearless moral inventory of ourselves. A step 8. More feared than the
step 9 when we apologize. More feared than the second step where we relinquish
control. But not nearly as feared as the first step in admitting to ourselves
that we powerless over so much. The denial of which is our own greatest
problem. These colossal steps are for individuals to take. One giant leap for a
man is many smaller steps to some other guys. Our strides are not the same. To
ask such a large movement of feet on the grander scale is asking for too much.
But asking individuals to take small steps within their person, allows each to
go in the direction each is guided to go and then the movement of the
collective is inevitable. It just shifts.
I do not ask you to move me. Still, you do. Mostly when
humbled and human. Mostly when there is no intended push. I pull myself along,
dragging myself behind me. Not sure if I can carry my own weight. Certain I
cannot carry yours. Is this my strength or is it my perception? How can I know
the difference? Is there a difference? Is this how I see it or is the weight truly
too much to bear?
How do we see ourselves fearlessly? Is an inventory of
morality necessary to apologize? In what ways can we shift our powerlessness to
have more control over ourselves? What
is our grand expression of this? Where are the truths of our perceptions
flawed? What is binding our footing?
What is weighing our steps? I look at the differences between art and science
and wonder how the techniques of each might help us understand ourselves. How
they carry the weight of the collective. How they describe the perceptions of
our culture. I feel art has a gift to offer to science. A way of seeing the
present. How are these two leaders of the collective culture describing the
common vision of today? Or better yet, what the view of today will be at a
distance. How will they move us through? How do we see ourselves in it?
Artists embrace their own perception. They own it. This is
what is theirs. The expression of this individual perception is the core of the
artist. Duchamp said there are two kinds of artists; those who work for society
and those who don’t. Which are we? The more pertinent question might be, the
internal, “Who am I?” and then allowing that answer to exploit itself through
us. Let it use itself, in a way, to be the thing that it is. And ask it what it
feels, how it perceives, what happened to make it feel that way, what that
perception required of the senses, what is the rationale? What is the acumen? Then
own that perception so that the internal you/I/us/we can get comfortable with
the idea that everybody has one, a perception. And allow that.
In art, the more one can identify with their own perception,
the better they can convey that perception to an audience. The audience greets
this representation as such, a representation of a perception even if the
subject or medium has a real-world tangibility or purpose, and do not demand
from it practical utility. We do not ask anything of the artist except their
purest expression of their own personal perception. We find this honest and we
The scientist seeks the truth through disapproval of the
false. We enjoy this logic. It gives us a comfort in the concrete solidity of
knowing. It is fueled by wonder even though its ultimate purpose is to quell
that wonder. It is driven by questions. It balks at its own answers. They only
produce more questions. Bricks building institutions of uncured concrete. We
have built so much on our faith in these tools. A kingdom palaced in the
grandeur of reason. It is spectacular. It is fortified. It is starting to
crumble in the seams. It is running its answers into its own walls.
Science finds itself in a never-ending banter of conflicting
perceptions. Individualism is often met with a defense from the collective. Genius
is often met with distain. The notion that most closely resembles the
collective thought is deemed greatest. Not for its quality of authenticity but
for its support of the foundation. It’s ok if it looks like the next step. It
is not ok if it is a different ladder. Ideas are not shared freely but shadowed
by the umbrella of consequence that looms over the pier to review. Waves must
match the rhythm of the sea to be shored. Much brilliance is dissolved in the
tides. Until big storms come. Collections of evaporated thoughts merge in a
different sphere and rain down with force to meet the populations inland. Wars
begin. We see this as valor and we deem
it fair. Is this science or is this politics? Whose censure drives the reigns?
Where is the end of the scope of this perception? How many mirrors does it take
to see the light?
Can the artist sitting calmly in their view translate the
power of owning their own scope? Would you argue about a shade of blue? Should you
tell them that you didn’t get their joke?
Of course, you should. You should question their every
stroke. Not out of malice to prove them wrong. Out of sentimental curiosity.
Out of wanting to know why. Out of personalizing the piece which has been translated
before you by listening to the interpretation of the translator.
Science draws graphs, makes models, 3D imaging of space
dust, high definition videos of single celled organisms, panoramas of atoms,
all in wavelengths of light. What you and I cannot see, those things to which
we are not naturally privy, are all collected as data and translated to us via a
graph, a chart, a satellite image broken down into two-digit codes and rebuilt
using processing software; this color for gamma scale, that saturation for
solar wind, a hint of electron flux on this line, like music drawn in the
atmosphere. You can watch it write its song in real time.
How is this not an expression of humanity’s perception? How
is this not art? Everything visible, translated through perceivable light. Metered
like the footsteps of poetry. Of course, we would all still see it differently.
Of course, we should ask for the scientific interpretation and take that
insight just as we might that of the artist. But, that we cannot. Science has a
funny hierarchy of ownership. It demands a collective view. It demands every
viewer stand in the same spot. However will we fit? Why does science feel the way it does about
the way it feels? Should it “feel” anything at all? Is there an art to it? Does
it have any sense? Can science be divided into the perceptions of individuals
and remain effective? How much would be gained or lost through this
translation? Is there a shifting of weight that can strengthen our own resolve
without the dissolving of solutions? Is a diploma necessary for diplomacy? Does
lack of one warrant war? On an idea? On a perception? On an interpretation? On
an expression? Is that effort valiant?
Perception doesn’t change the notes of the music. It changes
the way those notes make us feel. Art and science are both equally true
versions of reality. They are representations of how we perceive ourselves and
the world at a point in time. They are malleable, transient, and evolving. They
are how we know ourselves. They are how we tell the story about it. They are
visual accounts of our change. I am wondering why we’re seeing it this way. I’m
wondering what how we are seeing it has to do with how well we are seeing
ourselves. Would changing our rigid perceptions on what we value within
ourselves bring clarity to understanding what lies ahead? Would it reconnect us
to ourselves? Would it give us different answers so we can wonder better why’s?
How would we feel about that?